Iturralde González Questions the Management of the RFEF in Spain-Egypt

Controversy at the RCDE Stadium: Iturralde González questions the management of the RFEF in the Spain-Egypt

The former referee harshly criticizes the official version of the Islamophobic incidents and questions the referee's actions.

Tuesday night at the RCDE Stadium, during the Spain-Egypt friendly, was marked by a series of incidents of an Islamophobic nature that have generated an intense debate about the management of the match. The Royal Spanish Football Federation (RFEF) defended its actions, ensuring that the protocol was strictly followed and that the information was transferred to the referee quartet in real time.

However, Iturralde González, former referee and analyst, does not share this version. In his speech in 'El Larguero' (SER), he described the RFEF's statement as “false from the first instance.” According to him, the first racist chants arose around the tenth minute, long before half-time was called, and Bulgarian referee Georgi Kabakov was not immediately notified.

“Forgive me for doubting that a referee does not stop the game and say that he is going to warn it at half-time. I would like to know what the delegate of the Spanish team says to the referee. I doubt it a lot. I can't believe it, I'm sorry,” commented Iturralde, showing his disbelief at the management of the situation by the referee and the federation.

Iturralde's analysis highlights the seriousness of the matter: if it is confirmed that the referee decided to wait until half-time to intervene, he should not continue refereeing. “It is so serious that the RFEF should have issued a statement saying that the referee is to blame for not applying the protocol. It cannot be that the Government has reached out and the federation acts by calling its journalists. This is not from a serious federation,” he said.

The controversy intensifies because the RFEF seems to indirectly point to the referee of the match by justifying that he activated the protocol only at half-time. For Iturralde, this decision constitutes negligence that affects the credibility of the federation and the safety of the players and fans present in the stadium.

In the days after the game, criticism has multiplied on social networks and the media. The situation highlights the need to review the protocols for action in the event of discriminatory incidents, especially in international matches that have great media and political impact.

The RFEF, for its part, insists that it acted in accordance with the rules. He ensures that communication with the referee team was immediate and that any decision was made respecting the procedure. However, experts like Iturralde question the transparency and effectiveness of these measures.

To contextualize, the action protocols for racist incidents in Spanish football establish that the referee must stop the game and warn the public through the stadium's megaphones. If chanting persists, more severe sanctions may be applied, including temporary or permanent suspension from the match. The controversy arises precisely in the interpretation and timing of applying these measures.

This episode has also opened a debate about the training and responsibility of referees in high-level events. Media and political pressure, together with the complexity of managing discriminatory behavior in real time, highlights the need for clearer and more uniform protocols.

The repercussion of the events has transcended the sports field and has generated comments from the Government and various human rights associations. The demand for explanations by the RFEF reflects social sensitivity towards discrimination in sport and the obligation to guarantee a safe environment for all participants.

In parallel, refereeing specialists remind that any delay in the application of corrective measures can seriously damage the image of the federation and public confidence in the fairness of the game. Furthermore, they emphasize that the referee does not act in isolation; must coordinate with delegates and the party organization to ensure that decisions are made correctly and effectively.

The debate remains open, and experts agree that the next few days will be crucial to determine responsibilities and possible improvements to the protocols. The controversy at the RCDE Stadium is already considered a case study on the management of racial incidents in Spanish football.

With media pressure and attention from international organizations, the RFEF is at a decisive moment. The Spain-Egypt match has left lessons about the importance of speed in decision-making and the need to reinforce the training of referees on discrimination issues.

This case also invites us to reflect on the role of the media in the dissemination of sporting incidents and the responsibility of federations to protect the image of sport without hiding serious problems. Transparency and accountability are essential elements to maintain institutional credibility.

FAQ on the Spain-Egypt controversy

1. What happened in the Spain-Egypt match at the RCDE Stadium?
Islamophobic chants towards players from Egypt were recorded, which generated controversy about the actions of the referee and the RFEF.

2. What does the RFEF say about the incidents?
The federation ensures that the protocol was followed and that the referee was informed in real time.

3. Why does Iturralde González question the RFEF?
Because he considers that the official information does not reflect reality: the warning to the referee was not immediate and the chants began long before half-time.

4. Who was the referee of the match?
The Bulgarian referee Georgi Kabakov, whose performance has been questioned by Iturralde.

5. What does the RFEF protocol say regarding racist incidents?
Stop the game, warn the public through the public address system and, if it persists, take more severe measures, including suspension of the game.

6. Were there sanctions after the game?
So far, no official sanctions have been announced; The controversy remains open.

7. What impact does this case have on Spanish arbitration?
It reinforces the need for specific training on racial incident management and decision making under pressure.

8. How did the public and media react?
It generated debate and criticism in networks and media, questioning the management of the party and the transparency of the federation.

9. Did the Government intervene in this matter?
There were comments and follow-up from authorities, highlighting social sensitivity to discrimination in sport.

10. Where can I follow updates on this controversy?
For more information and up-to-date discussions, it is recommended to join the Telegram channel: https://t.me/casino_gurus