Marcelino, ironic about arbitration: “Something could happen, right?”

68E22E3C2814C

Marcelino García Toral criticizes arbitration: “I didn't like the penalty at all”

Marcelino García ToralVillarreal technician, expressed his discontent regarding the arbitration of the recent party, where a penalty against him was marked and expelled Santiago Mouriño For double yellow card. Despite his caution by not wanting to deepen the controversy, he showed his opinion ironically, suggesting that “something could happen.”

During the press conference after the meeting, Marcelino was questioned about the performance of the referee: “I am not in favor of talking about the referee,” he replied. However, the insistence of journalists led him to share his opinion on the performance of Guillermo Cuadramentioning that arbitration had not left him good taste.

“It's your opinion. Even if you ask me 200 questions from the referee, I'm not going to talk. It doesn't correspond to me. But … something could happen, right?”

Marcelino stressed that in football, an arbitrary decision as a penalty can drastically change the dynamics of the party. “When the meeting is even, facilitate the rival the advantage is crucial. The second yellow card? That is something that the technical committee of referees should explain,” he said.

Despite his frustration, the coach assumed that Real Madrid had made the necessary merits to take the victory, although he also stressed that the game was defined by specific moments that influenced the development of the game. In his opinion, the beginning of the match was complicated for his team, especially after fitting the first goal in an individual play of Junior Vinícius.

“The first half the rival dominated us in excess, more than we would have liked. We defended in block under more than what we intended. However, at the end of the first part, we had the clearest occasion. We would have liked to have more ball and press above, but we managed to get ahead on the scoreboard,” he explained.

Marcelino acknowledged that the team needs Juventus: “We started again with a serious mistake and, from there, the penalty came at a time when we had practically nothing to do,” he concluded.

Arbitration analysis: Kagn the referee or players?

The arbitration phenomenon is a frequent issue in the world of football, where technicians and players are often tempted to blame referees for adverse results. Is the referee really the great villain in modern football or do you have to look the other way? This issue can lead to deep reflections on the nature of sport and its ethics.

We invite our readers to leave their opinions on this issue. Do you think that arbitration is a determining factor in the victory or defeat of a team? Participate leaving a comment or sharing this article on your social networks.

Frequent questions

Why does Marcelino not want to talk about the referee?
He considers that he does not correspond to criticize the arbitration work.
What arbitration decisions generated controversy in the party?
The penalty indicated against Villarreal and the expulsion of Mouriño.
How did the performance of Villarreal affect arbitration?
It facilitated that Real Madrid took advantage at a critical moment of the party.
Is it common for coaches to criticize arbitration?
Yes, it is a recurring theme in the press conferences after the matches.
What did Marcelino say about the mistakes of his team?
He said they must improve so as not to make failures that cost them goals.
What is the role of VAR in these situations?
The VAR seeks to correct clear errors, although its use has also generated controversy.
What strategies can equipment use to improve their performance?
Work on defense and reaction capacity after a embedded goal.
How do arbitral decisions influence the perception of the game?
Decisions can generate more tension and distrust of referees.
What do players think about the performance of the referees?
It varies, some openly criticize, while others prefer not to comment.
Are there consequences for referees that make serious mistakes?
The referee technical committee evaluates the performance of the referees and can take corrective measures.